Sometimes I think it is okay to use inductive reasoning to draw certain conclusioin... yet there is often insufficient to explain natural events. Therefore it make sense that human used other words like inducer, factors, competence, determined, and specification to elucidate an natural event.
Here, I would argue that the concept of creator and creation is oversimplifcatoin of logical thinking.
A + B = C
Is A+B the creator of C?
or
Is C equal to A + B? which there is no what so ever as creator or creation.
Can the universe is there so that earth is there?
------
A --> B ----> C
Is B the creator of C and A the creator of B?
or
A induces B to form C?
A is the inducer of B and B is the inducer of C.
To make it complicated
A + B <--> C
A+B are the factors of C yet C is the factor of A+B
A+B is the creator of C and C is the creator of A+B
A ---> C if A>1
A is competence to change fate to C only if A>1
or
The fate of A turn to be C when A the creator is greater than 1?
----------------------------------------
It is just my random thoughts..I have an exam tomorrow.... just want to kill some times.. ^_^
No comments:
Post a Comment